Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2001 18:49:20 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Setup testing Message-ID: <20011031184920.C28365@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com References: <1004523522 DOT 1521 DOT 37 DOT camel AT lifelesswks> <20011031142725 DOT A10174 AT redhat DOT com> <1004568440 DOT 1521 DOT 146 DOT camel AT lifelesswks> <20011031174758 DOT B28365 AT redhat DOT com> <1004571220 DOT 1701 DOT 162 DOT camel AT lifelesswks> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1004571220.1701.162.camel@lifelesswks> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.21i On Thu, Nov 01, 2001 at 10:33:34AM +1100, Robert Collins wrote: > >I think it's time we got a little wider testing done for setup.exe... > >here's what I'd like to do. > >1) have a snapshot of setup.exe included on the cygwin snapshots page, >built when a cygwin1.dll snapshot is built. > >2) Ask for limited (ie they email (say) me first) user testing and >feedback. > >I'm not interested in provoking a feedback storm on the cygwin mailing >list, but I think that 'idiot user' feedback is needed - even though we >aren't quite happy ourselves yet. > >1) Should be a trivial change to Chris' current snapshot script, and 2) >I'm happy to have as my problem :} Modifying the snapshot page to include setup.exe is also another challenge. I could put a link on the main page, if that is interesting. I would rather not be responsible for setup.exe snapshots, though. cgf