Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2001 16:22:08 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT Com Subject: Re: CVS branches RFC Message-ID: <20011004162208.A26858@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT Com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT Com References: <0f5701c14546$0bd99280$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks> <20010924183659 DOT B32477 AT redhat DOT com> <0fc101c1454a$aa8b8010$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks> <20010924185131 DOT A32613 AT redhat DOT com> <100d01c14550$bd31eaf0$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks> <3BBB6ED6 DOT 26A88BE3 AT yahoo DOT com> <03a501c14c58$2e1dc320$01000001 AT lifelesswks> <20011003181839 DOT C3772 AT redhat DOT com> <03f301c14c59$dfb6bd20$01000001 AT lifelesswks> <3BBC4995 DOT CA82EBCA AT yahoo DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3BBC4995.CA82EBCA@yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.21i On Thu, Oct 04, 2001 at 07:35:49AM -0400, Earnie Boyd wrote: >Robert Collins wrote: >> Which, BTW is why I suggested these scripts - small they are, but >> powerful too :}. >> > >Yep. And Chris could have created a branch for his changes so as to not >destroy a working snapshot. ;D. Huh? You lost me here. Robert says the scripts are powerful and you accuse me of "destroy"ing a working snapshot. I don't see how one observation flows from the other. And, I'm not sure what snapshot you think it was that was "destroy"ed. I'm not sure why my name suddenly poppped up in this context. cgf