Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2001 16:00:59 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: current dll problem on 95 - developers only issue? Message-ID: <20010909160059.A10868@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com References: <1000017853 DOT 2429 DOT 11 DOT camel AT lifelesswks> <1000026411 DOT 3978 DOT 14 DOT camel AT lifelesswks> <20010909151456 DOT A10464 AT redhat DOT com> <20010909215352 DOT J937 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20010909215352.J937@cygbert.vinschen.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.21i On Sun, Sep 09, 2001 at 09:53:52PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >Where are all these symbols used in that `inheap()' macro? They went here: >Sun Sep 9 15:02:44 2001 Christopher Faylor > > * heap.cc: Remove brk* macros for clarity throughout. I've checked in a fix. Thanks for the heads up. I wonder why I didn't notice this. There must be something wrong with the dependency checks in the Makefile. cgf