Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2001 21:19:56 +0200
From: Corinna Vinschen <vinschen AT redhat DOT com>
To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: I know CVS is hosed
Message-ID: <20010906211956.R537@cygbert.vinschen.de>
Reply-To: cygdev <cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
References: <20010906113843 DOT A30174 AT redhat DOT com> <1614189623 DOT 20010906194903 AT logos-m DOT ru> <20010906115913 DOT A30555 AT redhat DOT com> <20010906124935 DOT A31212 AT redhat DOT com> <20010906192727 DOT P537 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> <20010906133334 DOT C31668 AT redhat DOT com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <20010906133334.C31668@redhat.com>; from cgf@redhat.com on Thu, Sep 06, 2001 at 01:33:34PM -0400

On Thu, Sep 06, 2001 at 01:33:34PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 06, 2001 at 07:27:27PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >On Thu, Sep 06, 2001 at 12:49:35PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> >> In the meantime, if you could check out the enclosed patch and verify
> >> or disappoint, I'd be grateful.
> >
> >What exactly should HEAP_FREE be defined as??? Currently it isn't
> >anywhere.
> 
> Sorry.
> 
> cgf
> 
> Index: cygheap.h
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/uberbaum/winsup/cygwin/cygheap.h,v
> retrieving revision 1.21
> diff -p -r1.21 cygheap.h
> *** cygheap.h	2001/09/06 03:39:18	1.21
> --- cygheap.h	2001/09/06 17:32:41
> *************** details. */
> *** 12,17 ****
> --- 12,18 ----
>   
>   enum cygheap_types
>   {
> +   HEAP_FREE = 0,
>     HEAP_FHANDLER,
>     HEAP_STR,
>     HEAP_ARGV,

First it seemed to help but it just delays the crash, unfortunately.
I'm not quite sure which problem I should follow first, jik's or
yours...

Does it make sense to update to include your latest patch first?
If so, should I let this HEAP_FREE patch in or should I remove it
first?  

Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Developer                                mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat, Inc.