Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2001 01:32:36 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com Cc: cwilson AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu Subject: Re: cygwin 1.3.3 announcment -- extra words solicited Message-ID: <20010903013236.A22505@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com, cwilson AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu References: <999380998 DOT 30841 DOT ezmlm AT sources DOT redhat DOT com> <3B92D324 DOT 9030308 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <3B92EC8F DOT 3070605 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <20010902224411 DOT A21914 AT redhat DOT com> <3B92F0CF DOT 4040101 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <3B9313A1 DOT 4010200 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3B9313A1.4010200@ece.gatech.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.21i On Mon, Sep 03, 2001 at 01:22:41AM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote: >Charles Wilson wrote: > >>cgf wrote: >>>I did a reconfigure and a 'make clean all' without error. >> >>*while using a development kernel as your active cgywin1.dll* ? Or just >>the released 1.3.2 kernel? > > >cgf wrote: > >>I always use the latest CVS DLL for everything. Are you actually doing >>a "make install" while running cygwin? I can see how that could cause >>strange problems. >> > >No, not really. 'make install prefix=$inst/usr exec_prefix=$inst/usr >bindir=$inst/usr/bin libdir=$inst/usr/lib sysconfdir=$inst/etc >includedir=$inst/usr/include tooldir=$inst/usr' > >But the oops happens during the make, ('make CFLAGS=-O2 tooldir=/usr') >not make install. > >Thanks for clarifying that you, at least, *are* able to bootstrap (build >a new cygwin while running a devel cygwin). It's probably just me. I'd still like to see exactly where this is dying. You're saying "make" but that doesn't really mean much. Have you verified that you're dying in actual make code as opposed to cygwin1.dll code? cgf