Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date: Sun, 2 Sep 2001 23:33:05 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: cygwin 1.3.3 announcment -- extra words solicited
Message-ID: <20010902233305.A22044@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
References: <999380998 DOT 30841 DOT ezmlm AT sources DOT redhat DOT com> <3B92D324 DOT 9030308 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <3B92EC8F DOT 3070605 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <20010902224411 DOT A21914 AT redhat DOT com> <3B92F0CF DOT 4040101 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <3B92F0CF.4040101@ece.gatech.edu>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.21i

On Sun, Sep 02, 2001 at 10:54:07PM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote:
>Christopher Faylor wrote:
>
>
>>Yes, I've built a cygwin1.dll without error but I don't think I've
>>bootstrapped it in the manner that you are describing.  I rarely check
>>out anything via 'cvs checkout'.  I just use 'cvs update' to freshen
>>my tree.
>
>
>The key here is not how the local source tree was 'upped' to the latest 
>version.  I only did a complete checkout b/c I got the error with 'cvs 
>up' as well.  I hypothesized that the problem was due to my wacky guinea 
>pig status w.r.t. inherited directory permissions -- "*Leaving 
>directory* foobaz" ==> signal 11 -- so I wiped out my local source tree 
>and recreated it from scratch via "cvs checkout".  This insured that all 
>directories within my source tree had "good" permissions and whatnot.
>
>But that was wrong.
>
>Because after doing the complete checkout, I still saw the error.
>
>>
>>I did a reconfigure and a 'make clean all' without error.
>
>
>*while using a development kernel as your active cgywin1.dll* ?  Or just 
>the released 1.3.2 kernel?

I always use the latest CVS DLL for everything.  Are you actually doing
a "make install" while running cygwin?  I can see how that could cause
strange problems.

cgf