Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Subject: Re: Updated setup.ini with descriptions, categories, and
	dependencies
From: Robert Collins <robert DOT collins AT itdomain DOT com DOT au>
To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Cc: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
In-Reply-To: <20010828112714.A22388@redhat.com>
References: <20010827004327 DOT A14852 AT redhat DOT com>
	<20010828134119 DOT A25382 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de>
	<2022197257 DOT 20010828160649 AT logos-m DOT ru>
	<20010828142656 DOT C25382 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de>
	<9824009784 DOT 20010828163702 AT logos-m DOT ru>
	<20010828150605 DOT F25382 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> 
	<20010828112714 DOT A22388 AT redhat DOT com>
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Evolution/0.12 (Preview Release)
Date: 29 Aug 2001 11:55:27 +1000
Message-Id: <999050129.28151.8.camel@robertlinux>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 29 Aug 2001 01:56:31.0408 (UTC) FILETIME=[D2F5F300:01C1302D]

On 28 Aug 2001 11:27:14 -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> I don't mind trashing the tool but I'd like to understand why the RPM
> categories are not acceptable.

Some of them are accurate-but-misleading. Take squid for instance. Yes
it is a daemon.. but its much more intuitive (for me) to look for it as
a "Net" item. 
 
> WRT, breaking up cygwin into two packages, I think that that would just be
> busy work.  It would complicate my life to do this and I think it would
> complicate all of our lives when the questions start cropping up on the
> mailing list.

I agree. Somehow my rename it to libcygwin got lost however - what are
your thoughts on that? (the goal being removing the current
cygwin-the-distro, cygwin-the-project, cygwin-the-package) confusion
somewhat by making it (cygwin-the-distro, cygwin-the-project,
libcygwin-the-package).

> Ditto, ssh.  I've never liked the server/client distinction in RPM.
I'd
> rather just keep ssh as one package.

Splitting _can_ have some benefits in terms of being able to do more
lightweight installs for non-development machines. Server/client
splitting IMO doesn't usually bring those benefits. 

And IMO the project really isn't big enough to needs such splits (yet).

Rob