Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2001 14:26:56 +0200 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com, cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Updated setup.ini with descriptions, categories, and dependencies Message-ID: <20010828142656.C25382@cygbert.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygdev Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com, cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com References: <20010827004327 DOT A14852 AT redhat DOT com> <20010828134119 DOT A25382 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> <2022197257 DOT 20010828160649 AT logos-m DOT ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <2022197257.20010828160649@logos-m.ru>; from deo@logos-m.ru on Tue, Aug 28, 2001 at 04:06:49PM +0400 On Tue, Aug 28, 2001 at 04:06:49PM +0400, egor duda wrote: > Hi! > > Tuesday, 28 August, 2001 Corinna Vinschen vinschen AT redhat DOT com wrote: > > >> @ automake > >> sdesc: "A GNU tool for automatically creating Makefiles" > > CV> sdesc: "A tool for automatically generating GNU style Makefile.in's" > > >> category: Development/Tools > >> requires: ash perl > > CV> requires: ash cygwin perl > > why? automake doesn't contain any binaries. it's even made as "noarch" > rpm in linux distros, iirc. i suppose we shouldn't include "recursive > dependencies" into the list, should we? What exactly is `recursive' in the above list of required packages? Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Developer mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat, Inc.