Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2001 16:06:49 +0400
From: egor duda <deo AT logos-m DOT ru>
X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.53 RC/4)
Reply-To: egor duda <cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
Organization: deo
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Message-ID: <2022197257.20010828160649@logos-m.ru>
To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com, cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Updated setup.ini with descriptions, categories, and dependencies
In-Reply-To: <20010828134119.A25382@cygbert.vinschen.de>
References: <20010827004327 DOT A14852 AT redhat DOT com>
 <20010828134119 DOT A25382 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Hi!

Tuesday, 28 August, 2001 Corinna Vinschen vinschen AT redhat DOT com wrote:

>> @ automake
>> sdesc: "A GNU tool for automatically creating Makefiles"

CV> sdesc: "A tool for automatically generating GNU style Makefile.in's"

>> category: Development/Tools
>> requires: ash perl

CV> requires: ash cygwin perl

why? automake doesn't contain any binaries. it's even made as "noarch"
rpm in linux distros, iirc. i suppose we shouldn't include "recursive
dependencies" into the list, should we?

Egor.            mailto:deo AT logos-m DOT ru ICQ 5165414 FidoNet 2:5020/496.19