Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2001 17:58:16 +0200 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: serious problem with cygwin and winsock? Message-ID: <20010822175816.A16265@cygbert.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygdev Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com References: <20010821221717 DOT A27371 AT redhat DOT com> <20010822090825 DOT H17561 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20010822090825.H17561@cygbert.vinschen.de>; from vinschen@redhat.com on Wed, Aug 22, 2001 at 09:08:25AM +0200 On Wed, Aug 22, 2001 at 09:08:25AM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > I looked into net.cc and there are only a hand full of functions concerned: > > cygwin_inet_ntoa > cygwin_getprotobyname > cygwin_getprotobynumber > cygwin_getservbyname > cygwin_getservbyport > cygwin_gethostbyname > cygwin_gethostbyaddr > > I will add static buffers or appropriate allocation functions in the > next days. Fortunately these functions are defined so that the > allocated structure is recycled on the next call by the same process... I checked in a fix half an hour ago. All seven functions are now using a local buffer which gets allocated on demand. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Developer mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat, Inc.