Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2001 18:24:38 +0400 From: egor duda X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.53 RC/4) Reply-To: egor duda Organization: deo X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <4268681989.20010822182438@logos-m.ru> To: Kazuhiro Fujieda Subject: Re: rxvt pops up console with 2001-Aug-07 shapshot In-Reply-To: References: <20010822132051 DOT L17561 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> <13659276735 DOT 20010822154753 AT logos-m DOT ru> <13266469788 DOT 20010822174746 AT logos-m DOT ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi! Wednesday, 22 August, 2001 Kazuhiro Fujieda fujieda AT jaist DOT ac DOT jp wrote: >>> On Wed, 22 Aug 2001 17:47:46 +0400 egor duda said: >> so, would it be sufficient to change your patch so that it will hide >> console window instead of destroying it? KF> If my patch is so, I guess it will hide the console window of KF> the bash shell when we execute a daemon process on it, won't it? hmm. if i understand things correctly, it won't call FreeConsole() with your patch in such case, will it? at least until you 'exit' from bash, and bash itself release console handles. i haven't looked into this issues too deep, so i may be wrong here. but i think if we change FreeConsole() to ShowWindow (hConsole, SW_HIDE); it will look identical on the screen. no? Egor. mailto:deo AT logos-m DOT ru ICQ 5165414 FidoNet 2:5020/496.19