Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2001 09:17:49 +0200 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: rxvt pops up console with 2001-Aug-07 shapshot Message-ID: <20010822091749.I17561@cygbert.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygdev Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com References: <20010814140130 DOT A26049 AT redhat DOT com> <20010815125949 DOT A768 AT dothill DOT com> <20010816010713 DOT A26439 AT redhat DOT com> <20010821222132 DOT A27443 AT redhat DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from fujieda@jaist.ac.jp on Wed, Aug 22, 2001 at 03:33:07PM +0900 On Wed, Aug 22, 2001 at 03:33:07PM +0900, Kazuhiro Fujieda wrote: > >>> On Tue, 21 Aug 2001 22:21:32 -0400 > >>> Christopher Faylor said: > > > If we can't get a resolution on this, I'm going to have to back this > > feature out. I'm sorry. I like the idea of the patch. It is too > > bad that it doesn't play well with rxvt. > > I'm sorry for my late response. I've tackled this problem for > the last few days, but I couldn't find any good idea. > > The feature really spoils the sophisticated work for the console > by rxvt. I agree it is backed out. I will try to find another > way to detach the console someday. If we only would find a way to get the information if a process is started from a service or not. Kazuhiro, did you find your original problem only with inetd and cygrunsrv or even when the process has been started by SRVANY??? I'm curious if we can't change the offending behaviour by reverting a specific change from inetd and cygrunsrv. We already had a problem with windows poping up when calling `net show' or similar from a telnet session which we solved by using a patch from Egor. He suggested to add a call to `AllocConsole()' to inetd. When I wrote cygrunsrv I just used the same call since it had proven to be ok from my point of view. Perhaps we should add a switch to cygrunsrv whether it should call AllocConsole() or not?!? Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Developer mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat, Inc.