Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2001 13:16:49 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: libiberty fix
Message-ID: <20010818131649.A5671@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
References: <998079721 DOT 25172 DOT ezmlm AT sources DOT redhat DOT com> <3B7DA3A6 DOT 4060801 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <20010817204702 DOT C23849 AT redhat DOT com> <20010817225133 DOT A27937 AT redhat DOT com> <3B7E0566 DOT 4040603 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.11i
In-Reply-To: <3B7E0566.4040603@ece.gatech.edu>; from cwilson@ece.gatech.edu on Sat, Aug 18, 2001 at 02:04:22AM -0400

On Sat, Aug 18, 2001 at 02:04:22AM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote:
>Christopher Faylor wrote:
>
> > It's not a matter of ignoring.  I was trying to fix a specific
> > problem. The problem was not "How do I get libiberty working with
> > 2.52?"  It was how do I get a specific problem fixed.
> >
> > As a scientist, I know that you understand that changing two
> > variables at once is rarely a good method for solving a problem.
> > The issue of whether configure works in 2.52 is not something that
> > really concerns me.  That's an issue that can be hashed out in the
> > gcc-patches mailing list.
>
>Sure -- except that those using the latest autoconf could not assist you
>in testing your changes -- "you must regenerate configure", but I could
>not.  I note that your latest patch (the .tar.bz2 one) includes the
>2.13-generated configure.  :-)

Yes.  I learned from the last time that some people needed configure.  I
sent out a configure script previously, too.

cgf