Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2001 17:57:11 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To: Cygwin-Developers AT Cygwin DOT Com
Subject: Re: Does CVS build?
Message-ID: <20010815175711.A16186@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin-developers AT Cygwin DOT Com
Mail-Followup-To: Cygwin-Developers AT Cygwin DOT Com
References: <20010815132450 DOT A1468 AT dothill DOT com> <3B7AEC05 DOT 7FBF0C8C AT yahoo DOT com> <20010815155157 DOT B20199 AT redhat DOT com> <20010815162916 DOT A28118 AT redhat DOT com> <20010815171031 DOT A29030 AT redhat DOT com> <3B7B0796 DOT 2DF865D1 AT yahoo DOT com> <3B7AED5F DOT 7050603 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.11i
In-Reply-To: <3B7AED5F.7050603@ece.gatech.edu>; from cwilson@ece.gatech.edu on Wed, Aug 15, 2001 at 05:45:03PM -0400

On Wed, Aug 15, 2001 at 05:45:03PM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote:
>"autoconf 2.13 -> 2.50 for libiberty in gcc-2.95.3"
>http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/bug-autoconf/2001-June/000751.html
>
>But I think these changes force libiberty to be 2.52 ONLY, and don't 
>preserve back-compatibility with 2.13 (I'm not sure, though).

I'm using 2.13 and the generated configure script is nearly identical
except for my changes.

cgf