Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
X-Apparently-From: <earnie?boyd AT yahoo DOT com>
Message-ID: <3B781601.D74D5495@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2001 12:01:37 -0600
From: Earnie Boyd <earnie_boyd AT yahoo DOT com>
Reply-To: CD List <Cygwin-Developers AT Cygwin DOT Com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (WinNT; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: CD List <Cygwin-Developers AT Cygwin DOT Com>
Subject: Is it mv or Cygwin?
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Can one of the developers, off the top of their head, tell me if it is
mv or Cygwin that is deciding to recursively copy if the initial move of
a directory fails?  I want to modify the action and would appreciate a
quick pointer if someone know without looking.

Thanks,
Earnie.

_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com