Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Subject: Re: outstanding issues blocking new release? From: Robert Collins To: cygdev In-Reply-To: <20010807105917.F22015@cygbert.vinschen.de> References: <20010806213235 DOT A24499 AT redhat DOT com> <20010807105917 DOT F22015 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Evolution/0.12 (Preview Release) Date: 07 Aug 2001 23:48:46 +1000 Message-Id: <997192126.579.17.camel@lifelesswks> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 07 Aug 2001 13:37:21.0821 (UTC) FILETIME=[15DF44D0:01C11F46] On 07 Aug 2001 10:59:17 +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > > > I'm still a tiny bit concerned about Windows 9x/Me but maybe people will test > > this if I ask about it in the cygwin mailing list... > > Don't worry. Microsoft is concerned about 9x/ME as well. That's one > of their reasons to release XP. Hey, I have an idea. What about > dropping 9x/ME support completely after XP is released? ;-) > I presume that was humour ? Anyway, FWIW, I'm against dropping 9x support, at least until ReactOS has a GUI || Windows XP stops requiring activation. (I play with my hardware. Lots... ) I'm more worried about the rumours/comments/statments that XP has a new kernel - leading to the 3/4th (depending if you consider ME to be substantively different under the hood) set of vaguaries that Cygwin has to support :|.... Rob > Corinna > > -- > Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to > Cygwin Developer mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com > Red Hat, Inc.