Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 09:30:01 -0400 From: Jason Tishler To: Cygwin-Developers Subject: Re: 2001-06-28 CVS ash Background Win32 Process Hang Problem Message-ID: <20010716093001.A561@dothill.com> Mail-Followup-To: Cygwin-Developers Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20010713201339.A11377@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.18i Organization: Dot Hill Systems Corp. Chris, On Fri, Jul 13, 2001 at 08:13:39PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Fri, Jul 13, 2001 at 03:09:05PM -0400, Jason Tishler wrote: > >On Tue, Jul 10, 2001 at 04:28:11PM -0400, Jason Tishler wrote: > >> The problem does not occur in 1.3.2 -- so it has been introduced since > >> that release. > > > >It appears that this problem was introduced somewhere between 1.3.2 > >(which uname -a indicates was built on 2001-05-20 23:28) and when the > >2001-05-22 snapshot was built. Unfortunately, even after reviewing the > >CVS commit mailing list, I could not find the culprit. > > The problem is due to a bug in vfork. I thought I'd reported that in > the past. While reading cygwin-cvs, I did see the following: http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-cvs/2001-q2/msg00182.html Now I understand why I'm seeing the problem starting with the first snapshot after 1.3.2. Should the build process default to turning off vfork (i.e., --enable-vfork=no) until the bug is fixed? Thanks, Jason -- Jason Tishler Director, Software Engineering Phone: 732.264.8770 x235 Dot Hill Systems Corp. Fax: 732.264.8798 82 Bethany Road, Suite 7 Email: Jason DOT Tishler AT dothill DOT com Hazlet, NJ 07730 USA WWW: http://www.dothill.com