Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2001 21:09:01 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Looking into setup problems Message-ID: <20010708210901.A17813@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com References: <20010706162127 DOT A2888 AT redhat DOT com> <20010706183156 DOT A4441 AT redhat DOT com> <20010706235846 DOT A5882 AT redhat DOT com> <20010707004826 DOT A6462 AT redhat DOT com> <006101c106ee$a77db0e0$6464648a AT ca DOT boeing DOT com> <20010707103743 DOT B7944 AT redhat DOT com> <00a801c107fa$27e593e0$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.11i In-Reply-To: <00a801c107fa$27e593e0$0200a8c0@lifelesswks>; from robert.collins@itdomain.com.au on Mon, Jul 09, 2001 at 08:05:52AM +1000 On Mon, Jul 09, 2001 at 08:05:52AM +1000, Robert Collins wrote: >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Christopher Faylor" >> On Sat, Jul 07, 2001 at 07:07:27AM -0700, Michael A. Chase wrote: >> >----- Original Message ----- >> >From: "Christopher Faylor" >> > >> > >> >> On Fri, Jul 06, 2001 at 11:58:46PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: >> > >> >> >I hate to say this, but I have become somewhat disenchanted with >this >> >> >prev/curr/test stuff. >> >> >> >> I've taken a stab at fixing the current behavior, despite my >> >> disenchantment. >> >> >> >> If you select "test" then the test version of sources will be >> >> downloaded/ installed, etc. >> > >> >Once we have Categories working, you could change the Prev, Curr, >Test radio >> >buttons to plain buttons which set the state of all visible packages. >> >"Skip", "Source", and "Source Only" buttons would be handy then too. >As >> >wide as the package select dialog box is getting, we will have lots >of room >> >for buttons. >> >> But why not use the current method that we have for packages? Use the >> same multiple select method that DJ used for packages to set the >defaults. > >I don't think Michael was proposing changing the multiple select method >per se - I think he was suggesting that as well as prev, curr and test, >we have source only and skip options at the top. I agree with that - >until we can record the users preferences for skipping files, I will be >forever clicking on skip on squid and postgresql. I was suggesting roughly the same thing. I was just saying that we should use the same mechanism for choosing at the "top" of the dialog as we use inside. cgf