Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-ID: <004c01c103b1$60fbe460$0300a8c0@ufo>
From: "Trevor Forbes" <trevorforbes AT ozemail DOT com DOT au>
To: <cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
References: <005f01c101e3$4471fed0$6464648a AT ca DOT boeing DOT com> <20010702001752 DOT A20206 AT redhat DOT com> <004101c102d4$43517a20$0300a8c0 AT ufo> <20010702144536 DOT C12135 AT redhat DOT com>
Subject: Re: Setup.exe 2.78.2.2 test satisfactory
Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2001 20:44:49 +0930
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200


----- Original Message -----
From: "Christopher Faylor" <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To: <cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2001 4:15 AM
Subject: Re: Setup.exe 2.78.2.2 test satisfactory


> On Mon, Jul 02, 2001 at 06:22:01PM +0930, Trevor Forbes wrote:
> >From: "Christopher Faylor" <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
> >> Anyone else tried this?
> >
> >
> >Yes, but the last time I reported setup was good, all hell broke loose
when
> >it was released.....;)
> >
> >This one, however, has some bugs...if you select experimental then
> >"view - full", the "new" column is full of uninstalls and some incorrect
> >versions.  "view - partial" the same.....
>
> This is a pretty serious bug.  I understand the uninstall.  I don't
understand
> the "incorrect version".  What is wrong with the version?
>
> cgf

Sorry, for not being so clear..... The incorrect version I was referring to
was that some items were reverting to previous versions.  However, your
fixed version has corrected the bugs I reported and works fine on the basic
tests I did...
Darn ...I just noticed you have made more changes....

Good work to all involved....

The delayed response is because I live in central Australia......

Regards Trevor