Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2001 15:51:00 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Setup.exe 2.78.2.2 test satisfactory
Message-ID: <20010702155100.A13123@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
References: <005f01c101e3$4471fed0$6464648a AT ca DOT boeing DOT com> <20010702001752 DOT A20206 AT redhat DOT com> <004101c102d4$43517a20$0300a8c0 AT ufo> <20010702144536 DOT C12135 AT redhat DOT com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.11i
In-Reply-To: <20010702144536.C12135@redhat.com>; from cgf@redhat.com on Mon, Jul 02, 2001 at 02:45:36PM -0400

On Mon, Jul 02, 2001 at 02:45:36PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>On Mon, Jul 02, 2001 at 06:22:01PM +0930, Trevor Forbes wrote:
>>From: "Christopher Faylor" <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
>>>Anyone else tried this?
>>
>>Yes, but the last time I reported setup was good, all hell broke loose
>>when it was released.....;)
>>
>>This one, however, has some bugs...if you select experimental then
>>"view - full", the "new" column is full of uninstalls and some
>>incorrect versions.  "view - partial" the same.....
>
>This is a pretty serious bug.  I understand the uninstall.  I don't
>understand the "incorrect version".  What is wrong with the version?

I've checked in a fix for the uninstall problem but I'm still mystified
about the incorrect version.

This has been checked into both the trunk and the branch.

cgf