Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2001 22:26:04 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com, cygwin-patches AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: hierarchy in setup (category stuff) Message-ID: <20010629222604.A11444@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin-patches AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com, cygwin-patches AT cygwin DOT com References: <06a001c0fc51$7a87e210$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks> <20010629114004 DOT A6990 AT redhat DOT com> <20010629172912 DOT A8991 AT redhat DOT com> <032001c100fe$d62310c0$806410ac AT local> <20010629205735 DOT K9607 AT redhat DOT com> <034701c10106$34f6b6e0$806410ac AT local> <036501c10108$b55383c0$806410ac AT local> <20010629221309 DOT A11334 AT redhat DOT com> <038301c1010a$bab7e840$806410ac AT local> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.11i In-Reply-To: <038301c1010a$bab7e840$806410ac@local>; from robert.collins@itdomain.com.au on Sat, Jun 30, 2001 at 12:16:52PM +1000 On Sat, Jun 30, 2001 at 12:16:52PM +1000, Robert Collins wrote: > >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Christopher Faylor" >To: ; >Sent: Saturday, June 30, 2001 12:13 PM >Subject: Re: hierarchy in setup (category stuff) > > >> On Sat, Jun 30, 2001 at 12:02:24PM +1000, Robert Collins wrote: >> >Michael, >> > I think I trashed some of your src related patches, CVS didn't report >> >any errors merging, but I just have this nasty suspicion. >> >> You did. All of my changes are gone, too. >> >> I'd like to revert CVS to pre-your-change and try again. Is that ok? > >It's possibly easier just to grab the diffs that you committed before and >apply those again. (ie cvs rdiff -r 2.33 -r 2.35 choose.cc ) I'd tried that (or cvs diff, actually). There are a lot of rejections when I do that. Do you know the revisions of the files that you had in your sandbox? I had done checkins to two files on 2001-06-25. I assume that you were probably up-to-date with the 2001-06-17 versions of those files previously, right? cgf