Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2001 11:40:04 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To: cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com, cygwin-patches AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: hierarchy in setup (category stuff)
Message-ID: <20010629114004.A6990@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin-patches AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com,
	cygwin-patches AT cygwin DOT com
References: <04e801c0faa2$f9008260$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks> <20010621222615 DOT C13746 AT redhat DOT com> <3B3324A7 DOT 49FFC98A AT yahoo DOT com> <054c01c0fbef$5f600e20$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks> <06a001c0fc51$7a87e210$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.11i
In-Reply-To: <06a001c0fc51$7a87e210$0200a8c0@lifelesswks>; from robert.collins@itdomain.com.au on Sun, Jun 24, 2001 at 12:00:43PM +1000

On Sun, Jun 24, 2001 at 12:00:43PM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Robert Collins" <robert DOT collins AT itdomain DOT com DOT au>
>
>
>>
>> I've attached my current sandbox changes. The code _is not finished_.
>(I
>> am _looking_ at adding the prev/curr/exp capability to whole
>categories
>> as well as the code cleanliness I mention below).
>>
>
>Still not 100%, but much cleaner and easier to read:
>
>Known bugs:
>1) The partial view when you enter the package list has a scroll bar one
>line too many long.
>2) The category view always shows _all_ packages. There's no
>category-partial view. Do we need one?

I just played with this and I like what I see.

I had a hard time getting all of the changes into the current CVS, though,
and the view was sort of screwed up.

Robert, if you are still interested, then I think that this is definitely the
way to go.  If you have something worth checking in, then please do so.

One thing I noticed is that the Category view is not the default and I think
it should be.  Or, maybe that was just a botched patch.

Thanks,
cgf