Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 12:18:57 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To: cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Subject: Re: New Version Display Values in choose.cc
Message-ID: <20010620121857.B3129@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
References: <000901c0f842$676c3a90$6464648a AT ca DOT boeing DOT com> <20010618234653 DOT A29871 AT redhat DOT com> <005c01c0f8ac$75386f30$6464648a AT ca DOT boeing DOT com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.11i
In-Reply-To: <005c01c0f8ac$75386f30$6464648a@ca.boeing.com>; from mchase@ix.netcom.com on Tue, Jun 19, 2001 at 03:36:58AM -0700

On Tue, Jun 19, 2001 at 03:36:58AM -0700, Michael A. Chase wrote:
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Christopher Faylor" <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
>To: <cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
>Sent: Monday, June 18, 2001 20:46
>Subject: Re: New Version Display Values in choose.cc
>
>
>> On Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 01:32:22PM -0700, Michael A. Chase wrote:
>> >I'm seeing both "Keep" and "Skip" as I rotate through the actions in the
>> >choose dialog box for modules that are already installed.  Aren't they
>> >basically synonyms in that case?  I can see where to skip "Skip" if the
>> >module is installed, but I might be missing a reason for showing both.
>>
>> "Keep" shows up when the version in the left column matches the center
>> one.  "Skip" means don't bother installing the package at all.
>>
>> It's a subtle difference but I didn't think that this was anything that
>> I introduced.
>
>If I understand correctly, "Skip" shouldn't appear if the package is already
>installed.  I think the situation has existed all along.  I'll submit a
>patch later today.

It should show up if the installed package is not the same as the one selected
to be installed in the left column.

cgf