Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Date: Mon, 14 May 2001 16:01:53 EDT To: Cygwin Developers Subject: Re: What is dtable X-Mailer: Virtual Access by Atlantic Coast PLC, http://www.atlantic-coast.com/va Message-Id: From: Brian Keener Reply-To: bkeener AT thesoftwaresource DOT com In-Reply-To: <3B0012D3.2508BBE0@yahoo.com> References: <20010511220359 DOT B30801 AT redhat DOT com> <3AFFDBB1 DOT 898203E2 AT yahoo DOT com> <3B0012D3 DOT 2508BBE0 AT yahoo DOT com> Earnie Boyd wrote: > Ok. So did *YOU* do the `make clean' from /usr/develop/obj or are you *I* did the make clean in /usr/develop/obj/i686-pc-cygwin/winsup/cygwin after I realized something was wrong per Chris' response. > assuming the `make clean' in the script above did the clean? If the *I* was assuming the script would perform the 'make clean' which I thought was the purpose of the script to keep me from having to remember all the things to type. > latter the script is only executing the clean in the > i686-pc-cygwin/winsup/cinstall directory *I* don't see this in the script - as the cd to i686-pc-cygwin/winsup/cinstall is a comment (unless # character is no longer a comment) would this not mean that the previous cd to /usr/develop/obj would be the last one to occur and thus the script would be running the 'make clean' in that directory. > Which is not in the top build > directory! The top directory is /usr/develop/obj which was the last place cd'd to before the make clean. > If the former I don't understand why it would work for me > and not you. *I* don't either, obviously - maybe it's the evil Win95 vs WinNt thing again. I can only assume my script does not type so well and in the future *I* must type the 'make clean' myself from the appropriate directory instead of relying on a script to perform that action for me. If I upset you by insinuating that make would not do recursion - my apologies. I obviously made an incorrect assumption and once again shot my mouth off. One of these days I hope to learn to engage my brain before engaging my mouth.