Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Date: Mon, 7 May 2001 21:07:29 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com Subject: OT: A cygwin mailing list experiment Message-ID: <20010507210729.A32234@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.11i Corinna and I have decided to be conspicuously absent from the cygwin mailing list for this week (at least). I'd like to see what this does to the traffic there. It has occurred to me that one of the interesting reasons for excessive traffic on the list is that people are *too* helpful sometimes. If someone has a problem, there are often many attempts to help, resulting in multiple pieces of mail being sent to thousands of people. The other result of being overly helpful is that people are not apt to use whatever resources they have available, regardless of the number of times that we say "use the archives", or we point people at the FAQ, or Earnie gives his suggestion to use google.com (which I particularly like because it should be a superset of information available on cygwin.com). So, we're going to be conducting an experiment. If you are a frequent contributor to the mailing list, I'd invite you to join in. I'm really interested in seeing what happens. Try not responding to anything other than direct questions for a week or two. I think that the results will be interesting. Btw, the reason for doing this is that cygwin and cygwin-xfree are pretty much swamping the sources.redhat.com server. I've tried a couple of times to compose mail asking for suggestions for reducing the traffic. But, I couldn't bring myself to send it because I knew that it would either be ignored, or it would result in a flurry of clueless responses (not too cynical, am I?), which would aggravate the problem. cgf