Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date: Thu, 3 May 2001 10:50:12 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: 1.3.2 ho!
Message-ID: <20010503105012.A4464@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
References: <Pine DOT NEB DOT 4 DOT 30 DOT 0105011435220 DOT 27264-100000 AT cesium DOT clock DOT org> <Pine DOT NEB DOT 4 DOT 30 DOT 0105022145280 DOT 18125-101000 AT cesium DOT clock DOT org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.11i
In-Reply-To: <Pine.NEB.4.30.0105022145280.18125-101000@cesium.clock.org>; from matt@use.net on Wed, May 02, 2001 at 09:48:50PM -0700

On Wed, May 02, 2001 at 09:48:50PM -0700, Matt wrote:
>On Tue, 1 May 2001, Matt wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 1 May 2001, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>
>> > What needs to be fixed for 1.3.2?
>> >
>> > Here are the bugs that I am aware of:
>>
>> I'm noticing that on my win98 machine that ssh.exe seems to exit, but is
>> still running according to the process list. When I try to exit from
>> cygwin, cygwin will not exit until that ssh.exe is killed first.
>>
>> Let me try and reproduce with a snapshot and if the problem still exists,
>> attach to the ssh process with gdb and see if I can tell what's going on.
>> Regardless, I'll update the list with what I can infer.
>
>When I try to attach to the ssh in lala-land with GDB, gdb appears to
>choke and use a lot of CPU. gdb couldn't attach using the Cygwin process
>ID, so I used the Windows PID instead. GDB output a message saying it was
>attaching to process -2349823 (or somesuch number).

Um, yeah.  GDB uses the windows pid.  It always has.

What version of gdb are you using?  I have no problems attaching to processes.

Unfortunately, the strace was useless.

cgf