Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Subject: RE: architecture question MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.4417.0 content-class: urn:content-classes:message Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2001 10:55:48 +1000 Message-ID: Thread-Topic: architecture question Thread-Index: AcDBz0vjqzUGhQobQoaSjGt9HS646wAUtGuw From: "Robert Collins" To: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id WAA13722 > -----Original Message----- > From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:cgf AT redhat DOT com] > Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2001 3:38 AM > To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com > Subject: Re: architecture question > > > On Mon, Apr 09, 2001 at 02:12:46PM +1000, Robert Collins wrote: > >Chris, > > Some of the pthread code is really just calling the correct > >function, and could easily be implemented as a macro if the > appropriate > >headers were included in the userland programs... > > > >Is there someway to get the same result without forcing the > inclusion of > >windows headers? > > I don't see how. I think I feel more comfortable with > functions, though, > anyway. It's easier to fix things if we do find something wrong with > the implementation. > > cgf > Thanks. Functions it is. Rob