Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Subject: RE: New output from mount.exe MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2001 15:31:02 +1000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.4417.0 content-class: urn:content-classes:message Message-ID: Thread-Topic: New output from mount.exe Thread-Index: AcC7Neli3v/pMpYQSbe41EkDebNXHAAAAW4A From: "Robert Collins" To: "DJ Delorie" Cc: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id BAA05945 > -----Original Message----- > From: DJ Delorie [mailto:dj AT delorie DOT com] > Sent: Monday, April 02, 2001 3:36 PM > To: Robert Collins > Cc: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com > Subject: Re: New output from mount.exe > > > > > I was meaning like > > \\\\ for \\, so that bash et al won't get confused. (as opposed to > > skipping the \\'s). > > Why should bash care what mount prints? > It probably doesn't. The et al referred to Netsaint which I was thinking used the output of mount. I just realised it uses df, so I've started a goose chase. Sorry. Rob