Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2001 12:48:14 -0500
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: sched functions patch
Message-ID: <20010319124814.D18807@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
References: <00a701c0b05a$f1b94510$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.11i
In-Reply-To: <00a701c0b05a$f1b94510$0200a8c0@lifelesswks>; from robert.collins@itdomain.com.au on Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 08:56:52PM +1100

On Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 08:56:52PM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
>Chris - did you get my patch for sched* functions?

Am I to imply from this that you didn't read either of my to comments
about this?  They were sent to cygwin-patches.

No.  I didn't apply them yet.

cgf