Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2001 20:36:34 +0300 From: Egor Duda X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.45) Personal Reply-To: Egor Duda Organization: DEO X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <437795639.20010318203634@logos-m.ru> To: Christopher Faylor CC: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Outstanding issues with current DLL? In-reply-To: <20010318121519.F12880@redhat.com> References: <20010307213711 DOT E32721 AT redhat DOT com> <3AA79E39 DOT BC915295 AT yahoo DOT com> <20010308125701 DOT A4371 AT redhat DOT com> <3AA7CCBA DOT E84FD16E AT yahoo DOT com> <20010308133552 DOT A878 AT redhat DOT com> <3AA7E05A DOT BF9F2535 AT yahoo DOT com> <20010310184508 DOT A16745 AT redhat DOT com> <3AAFF6E9 DOT DFBF2C8 AT yahoo DOT com> <20010317180414 DOT A22971 AT redhat DOT com> <115297467 DOT 20010318180906 AT logos-m DOT ru> <20010318121519 DOT F12880 AT redhat DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi! Sunday, 18 March, 2001 Christopher Faylor cgf AT redhat DOT com wrote: CF> On Sun, Mar 18, 2001 at 06:09:06PM +0300, Egor Duda wrote: >>Sunday, 18 March, 2001 Christopher Faylor cgf AT redhat DOT com wrote: >> >>CF> On Wed, Mar 14, 2001 at 05:55:37PM -0500, Earnie Boyd wrote: >>>>This problem doesn't exist in the 2001-Mar-12 snapshot. However, I do >>>>have an occasional lockup on exit. The startup of the command window is >>>>much faster, I had more that fifty windows open in less than 30 seconds >>>>just by clicking on the >>>>Office shortcut icon. >> >>CF> The only lockup that I saw was when I tried to close the window using >>CF> the X in the upper right corner. When this happens, cygwin seems to >>CF> be stuck in a "wait for input from fd 0" loop. >> >>i see it too. when i start bash via rxvt and then type 'ps -l' >>bash it prints that rxvt and bash have different pgid's. so when rxvt >>receives WM_CLOSE message and tries to exit, it doesn't send SIGHUP to >>bash. so bash doesn't see that signal_arrived, and continue to wait >>for input. CF> Well, bash and ps should have different process groups. yes. they should. but i wonder whether rxvt and bash should have equal process groups or not? CF> I'm surprised that rxvt doesn't send something to its running CF> processes when it gets a SIGHUP. CF> Is rxvt ignoring the SIGHUP? Does anyone know? I would think that it CF> would do *something* on receiving this. no, it doesn't ignore SIGHUP. what it doesn't do is that it doesn't propagate SIGHUP to it's children. either when closed via 'X' button or via 'kill -HUP ' Egor. mailto:deo AT logos-m DOT ru ICQ 5165414 FidoNet 2:5020/496.19