Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 21:42:18 -0500
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Making a 1.1.8 release... or is it 1.3.0?
Message-ID: <20010129214218.A7731@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.11i

I think I'll be making a 1.1.8 release in the next couple of days.

Earnie, I assume that w32api and mingw are ok, right?  I'll make a new
release of those, too.

In the future, if you would like me to make a release of either of those
separate from a cygwin release, let me know.  That's why I uncoupled those
two releases from cygwin.

Or, if you want to take over release duties for them, that's fine, too.

On a different subject, is it time to bump the release to 1.3.0?  Red Hat
is working on a 1.2.0 version of the DLL which is loosely based on 1.1.6
(or so).  I wish I'd thought to bump the net release to 1.2.0 when we
branched but... I didn't.

cgf