Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2000 13:57:08 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Subject: Re: Silly Patch Question Message-ID: <20001108135708.N17097@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com References: <20001108085927 DOT D388 AT dothill DOT com> <20001108105034 DOT D17097 AT redhat DOT com> <20001108124739 DOT R388 AT dothill DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.6i In-Reply-To: <20001108124739.R388@dothill.com>; from Jason.Tishler@dothill.com on Wed, Nov 08, 2000 at 12:47:39PM -0500 On Wed, Nov 08, 2000 at 12:47:39PM -0500, Jason Tishler wrote: >On Wed, Nov 08, 2000 at 10:50:34AM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: >> On Wed, Nov 08, 2000 at 08:59:27AM -0500, Jason Tishler wrote: >> >How do people apply such a patch? There has to be a more automated way of >> >doing it that I'm missing. >> >> POSIXLY_CORRECT=1 patch -pblah < blahblah > >Thanks. When reading the patch man page, POSIXLY_CORRECT did not jump >out at me. I guess that I should have searched for "Index" too. It didn't jump out at me, either. I was editing the patch files with a perl script for years before I noticed this. cgf