Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2000 20:39:16 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Subject: Re: mount --show-cygdrive-prefixes patch Message-ID: <20001107203916.A14314@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com References: <20001106232857 DOT A108 AT dothill DOT com> <20001107000018 DOT C29268 AT redhat DOT com> <20001107203551 DOT A201 AT dothill DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.6i In-Reply-To: <20001107203551.A201@dothill.com>; from Jason.Tishler@dothill.com on Tue, Nov 07, 2000 at 08:35:51PM -0500 On Tue, Nov 07, 2000 at 08:35:51PM -0500, Jason Tishler wrote: >On Tue, Nov 07, 2000 at 12:00:18AM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: >> Won't this cause core dumps for older programs which might have relied >> on the previous behavior? I realize that there were probably exactly of >> zero of these outside of the mount program, but I'd rather have the old >> mount continue to work with the new cygwin. > >Isn't mount.exe upgraded when cygwin1.dll is upgraded? Theoretically, but if someone were to, say, just download a snapshot dll and install it in their /bin, then mount would stop working. cgf