Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-ID: <006601c02206$f08e9c40$3327f0d8@lag.net>
From: "Matt" <matt AT use DOT net>
To: <cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
References: <00a801c01e93$d6fe7500$3327f0d8 AT lag DOT net> <20000914172419 DOT A24259 AT cygnus DOT com>
Subject: Re: weird mount/ls behaviour
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2000 23:57:56 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400

> On Thu, Sep 14, 2000 at 02:36:27PM -0700, Matt wrote:
> >mount never seems to return an error if it can't qualify the win32
> >path supplied.
>
> Correct.  It never has and it is not intended to do so, AFAIK.

huh, ok. Why does 'ls' not show the bad mount point at all and 'ls -l' does?
This was the weird behaviour part of my report.