Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2000 12:13:47 -0400
From: Chris Faylor <cgf AT cygnus DOT com>
To: cygdev <cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
Subject: Re: Any better now?
Message-ID: <20000824121347.E12911@cygnus.com>
Reply-To: cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygdev <cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
References: <20000824000822 DOT A10979 AT cygnus DOT com> <39A5206F DOT 15DD74F8 AT cygnus DOT com> <39A52391 DOT C958ECD5 AT cygnus DOT com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.6i
In-Reply-To: <39A52391.C958ECD5@cygnus.com>; from vinschen@cygnus.com on Thu, Aug 24, 2000 at 03:30:57PM +0200

On Thu, Aug 24, 2000 at 03:30:57PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> 
>> Chris Faylor wrote:
>> >
>> > I've checked in some patches to cygwin which fix inetd/telnet operation
>> > for me.  Do they work for you, Corinna?  I haven't tried sshd yet.
>
>BTW: You can't compare inetd/sshd operations since inetd uses
>service manager operations. The inetd child isn't a real child
>process but a thread which is forked by the service manager.
>
>However, inetd operations aren't working correctly, too:
>
>- Starting inetd by `net start inetd':
>  Ok
>
>- Starting telnet session (fork/execs in.telnetd -> fork/execs login):
>  Ok
>
>- login exec's tcsh while in.telnetd manages communication:
>  Ok.
>
>- Ctrl-D exits tcsh:
>  Ok.
>
>- Exiting tcsh causes exiting in.telnetd:
>  Nope, in.telnetd remains in memory, wasting 100% CPU.

I don't see this.  in.telnetd goes away.

>- `net stop inetd' stops inetd:
>  Nope. It crashes with access violation.

Nor this.  inetd exits normally.

Could you send me your DLL?

cgf