Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2000 15:29:53 +0100 Message-ID: <7577-Tue22Aug2000152953+0100-starksb@ebi.ac.uk> X-Mailer: emacs 20.6.1 (via feedmail 9-beta-7 I); VM 6.75 under Emacs 20.6.1 From: David Starks-Browning MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Subject: latest/setup.exe In-Reply-To: <7003-Tue22Aug2000144506+0100-starksb@ebi.ac.uk> References: <7003-Tue22Aug2000144506+0100-starksb AT ebi DOT ac DOT uk> On Tuesday 22 Aug 00, David Starks-Browning writes: > ... > Also, the 4th paragraph says: > > If you want to manually select the packages, download them to > your local disk, putting them in an empty temporary > directory. Then, download the setup.exe program to the same > directory and run it from there. > > Again, don't they also need setup.ini? And shouldn't they be told > about cygwin/contrib? (Or does setup.exe work without setup.ini if > it's in a directory full of tar.gz files? I've only tried it within a > mirror of latest, and I know that fails.) Well, I just tried this again, and it actually works now, no 'null' install when mirroring just cygwin/latest and not cygwin. (Sorry, I should have double checked before writing about it.) Or maybe it works now because I have /etc/setup and didn't before? Anyway, one still misses contrib, and I would argue that's a good enough reason to remove setup.exe from latest. Cheers, David