Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com From: Chris Faylor Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2000 18:32:26 -0400 To: cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Subject: Re: time to unleash the new setup? Message-ID: <20000713183226.I7997@cygnus.com> Reply-To: cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com References: <200007132101 DOT RAA26744 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <20000713182652 DOT G7997 AT cygnus DOT com> <200007132232 DOT SAA27439 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i In-Reply-To: <200007132232.SAA27439@envy.delorie.com>; from dj@delorie.com on Thu, Jul 13, 2000 at 06:32:03PM -0400 On Thu, Jul 13, 2000 at 06:32:03PM -0400, DJ Delorie wrote: >> How about keeping the old setup around as "osetup.exe" and renaming to >> the new version. > >OK. > >> Do we need to update the FAQ, too? > >Only if we find frequently asked questions about the new setup. So >far, there haven't been *any* questions about the new setup. > >> Or should there be some other ancilliary documentation? > >Hopefully, documentation won't be needed. As a cop-out, I could claim >that hearing the complaints about the new setup on the net would help >guide us towards what kind of documentation is really needed. Good luck. cgf