Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Message-ID: <005001bfdb1c$42c5f4e0$0201a8c0@home.net> From: "Andrew Patrzalek" To: References: <003001bfdb14$fb514760$0201a8c0 AT home DOT net> <20000620202940 DOT A10791 AT cygnus DOT com> Subject: Re: scenario: no registry access, C:\ locked out Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2000 21:01:41 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6600 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600 System administrators are allowed to access the registry to change it, a non-privileged user is not. For instance, work stations on many networks are locked out, for various reasons, preventing a non-privileged user from running regedit to alter the registry. However, another partition, say d:\, is allowed for use by this user for programs which don't require the registry for running. This is where cygwin can really shine, 32-bit executables, no registry needed. Programs can be compiled, tested and demonstrated without violating network restrictions and commitments. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Chris Faylor" To: Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2000 8:29 PM Subject: Re: scenario: no registry access, C:\ locked out > On Tue, Jun 20, 2000 at 08:09:34PM -0400, Andrew Patrzalek wrote: > >As I have been somewhat of a spurious lurker, I wonder if the scenario > >where the end user does not have write access to c:\ and the registry > >is Adm. edit access only has been considered. The end user can still > >change the user environment but cannot use regedit for instance. B19*, > >B20* and v1.1.1 appear not to care. This is somewhat of a > >philosophical question that may have impact on portability issues down > >the road. Is there a movement toward having more involvement in things > >that lead to an end user editing the registry to make things work? > > I'm sorry but I really don't know what you are talking about. "edit access > only" to what? The registry? B19, B20, and v1.1 appear not to care about > what? Changing the registry? Are you talking about mounts? > > Can you provide a step by step example to show what you mean? > > cgf >