Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2000 16:41:29 +0100 Message-ID: <8631-Thu01Jun2000164129+0100-starksb@ebi.ac.uk> X-Mailer: emacs 20.5.1 (via feedmail 9-beta-7 I); VM 6.75 under Emacs 20.5.1 From: David Starks-Browning MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Subject: Re: prelim FAQ update: Installation Instructions In-Reply-To: <200006010340.XAA17277@envy.delorie.com> References: <451-Thu01Jun2000024714+0100-starksb AT ebi DOT ac DOT uk> <20000531231335 DOT D31958 AT cygnus DOT com> <200006010340 DOT XAA17277 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> On Wednesday 31 May 00, DJ Delorie writes: > > All mounts are binary by default. > > For re-installs, mounts will default to the previous state of the root > mount. For new installs (i.e. no previous cygwin on the *system*) > binary is the default. The user is given the option of selecting text > or binary, or accepting the default. OK, I've hinted at this in the current draft, for preview again at . I'll revisit the text when the new setup.exe is available. (Or I could add a "forward-looking statements" disclaimer at the bottom of the FAQ. :-) > > Could you add a strong recommendation to use a directory like > > c:\cygwin as the root rather than specifying something like c:\ ? > > The new setup will print this recommendation, and will require > additional confirmation before using a drive's root as the install > root. Good idea. While I was playing around with setup on a test machine, trying different things, I found that Setup would provide C:\ as a default root under certain circumstances, generally when the previous Setup attempt was aborted (^C). It looked like registry entries were created, but perhaps not populated correctly. This scenario might be confusing to a new user. Can Setup avoid it somehow? (This was Win98, BTW.) > > You refer to "the empty directory" under "Internet installation with > > setup.exe". Shouldn't that be "an empty directory"? > > The new setup will check the current directory, and warn of dangers > and require confirmation before proceeding in a non-empty directory. > Internet installs only, of course. Again, will the README file from 'latest' be permitted here? Cheers, David