Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Date: Tue, 23 May 2000 14:34:57 -0400 Message-Id: <200005231834.OAA23819@envy.delorie.com> From: DJ Delorie To: echristo AT cygnus DOT com CC: rdparker AT butlermfg DOT com, cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com In-reply-to: <392ACE39.1158B5F5@cygnus.com> (message from Eric Christopher on Tue, 23 May 2000 11:30:17 -0700) Subject: Re: setup: built-in tar References: <200005231735 DOT KAA02561 AT cygnus DOT com> <392ACE39 DOT 1158B5F5 AT cygnus DOT com> > Yes, however, they should be in the same directory. Preferably just > shipping them along with the install is preferable. Keeping some old > set of sources around is just a pain. Last time I talked about this with RMS, the result was that the minimum requirements be that it be on the same "site" (meaning same machine or cluster and same protocol (ftp/http)) and available to the user at the time the user downloaded the binary. I assume its location can't be obscured. Beyond that is merely convenience. We don't need to keep sources around on FTP in case some user who FTP'd a binary less than three years ago suddenly decides they need the sources. That rule only applies to a 3b distribution; our ftp is 3a.