Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com From: Chris Faylor Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2000 17:40:44 -0400 To: cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Subject: Re: Time for a new DLL release Message-ID: <20000428174044.A3864@cygnus.com> Reply-To: cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cgf AT cygnus DOT com, cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com References: <20000428171049 DOT F3289 AT cygnus DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.1.12i In-Reply-To: ; from mdejong@cygnus.com on Fri, Apr 28, 2000 at 02:31:20PM -0700 On Fri, Apr 28, 2000 at 02:31:20PM -0700, Mo DeJong wrote: >If we could use RPMs to do the install, a GUI should be easy because it >would just exec rpm. The only catch is how the system "knowns" what >rpms need to be updated by new versions. We would need some automated >way to figure this stuff out, it is not acceptable for people to "just >know" which RPMS needed to be downloaded. At any rate, I am willing to >help out on the GUI installer side. Experience has shown me to run screaming in the other direction whenever I hear someone say that "The GUI should just be easy." cgf