Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com From: Chris Faylor Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2000 15:29:14 -0400 To: cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Subject: Re: hybrid text/binary mount Message-ID: <20000426152914.E25220@cygnus.com> Reply-To: cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cgf AT cygnus DOT com, cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com References: <200004242026 DOT QAA06813 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.1.12i In-Reply-To: ; from juliano@cs.unc.edu on Wed, Apr 26, 2000 at 10:53:56AM -0400 On Wed, Apr 26, 2000 at 10:53:56AM -0400, Jeffrey Juliano wrote: >> > I think that most output is done in more than one character at a time >> > mode. >> >> Yeah, but consider, for example, raw PBM files. The first few lines >> are text lines, but after that the data is binary. One could easily > >FYI, emacs has done automatic UNIX/DOS/MAC detection for a while now. I >use NTemacs all the time, and I don't think it's ever guessed wrong for >me. I just tested on a raw PBM file, and it got it right. I assume that emacs can do that because it probably reads in the whole file and can guess much more precisely. 'vim' also seems to be pretty good at guessing for the same reason. I have had situations where 'vim' fails to guess correctly, though. cgf