Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com From: Chris Faylor Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2000 15:43:47 -0400 To: cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Subject: Re: symblinks problem Message-ID: <20000424154347.B1469@cygnus.com> Reply-To: cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cgf AT cygnus DOT com, cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com References: <20000424111811 DOT A8702 AT cygnus DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.1.12i In-Reply-To: ; from matt@use.net on Mon, Apr 24, 2000 at 12:41:34PM -0700 On Mon, Apr 24, 2000 at 12:41:34PM -0700, Matt wrote: >On Mon, 24 Apr 2000, Chris Faylor wrote: >>As far as I can tell from the strace, you aren't running a cygwin >>version of 'vi'. > >This is really weird, the cygwin installer didn't appear to install >it's own vi anywhere; that's not supposed to happen, is it? I'll wipe >this installation and try the newsetup.exe, assuming that vi is >supposed to be installed :) Yes. It is supposed to happen. We don't install a version of vi. We have never provided an editor with a net release. cgf