Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com To: cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Subject: Re: rename() is sometimes unsafe on remote drives. References: <20000417205014 DOT A5050 AT cygnus DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.106) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Kazuhiro Fujieda Date: 18 Apr 2000 11:49:19 +0900 In-Reply-To: Chris Faylor's message of Mon, 17 Apr 2000 20:50:14 -0400 Message-ID: Lines: 14 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.3/Emacs 19.34 >>> On Mon, 17 Apr 2000 20:50:14 -0400 >>> Chris Faylor said: > If, for some reason, the MoveFile of an existing > file fails, the target file will be gone. rename on UNIX doesn't work > this way. I have never been experienced this case. I tried to create the case so MoveFile fails and removes the target file, but could not. Can someone present an example of the case to me? ____ | AIST Kazuhiro Fujieda | HOKURIKU School of Information Science o_/ 1990 Japan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology