Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Message-ID: <779F20BCCE5AD31186A50008C75D997917170E@SILLDN_MAIL1> From: "Fifer, Eric" To: cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Subject: lstat() and implied .exe extension Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2000 19:24:24 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" I have a question about a recent change to stat_worker(): Sat Mar 25 20:46:39 2000 Christopher Faylor * syscalls.cc (stat_worker): Use extension search mechanism in path_conv to look for .exe rather than trying to special case it here. Before this change, an lstat() would more or less transparently add a .exe extension to a symlink'ed file: ln -s /bin/cat.exe ls -l cat.exe lrwxrwxrwx 1 fifere SIL_Equi 23 Apr 12 18:56 cat.exe -> /bin/cat.exe ls -l cat -rwxrwxrwx 1 fifere SIL_Equi 23 Apr 12 18:56 cat I say "more or less" because the non-exe version is considered a regular file. I assume in part this was done because ls ordinarily does a lstat() and if the file is a symlink follows up with a readlink(), and readlink() will not imply a .exe. After the change, lstat() does not imply a .exe: ls -l cat ls: cat: No such file or directory This isn't a big deal, but I was surprised by the change in behavior and thought I should ask whether the impact was anticipated. Thanks, Eric Fifer