Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>, <http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
To: cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Subject: Re: Net release status?
References: <20000308211013 DOT A29300 AT cygnus DOT com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.106)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
From: Kazuhiro Fujieda <fujieda AT jaist DOT ac DOT jp>
Date: 11 Mar 2000 17:35:36 +0900
In-Reply-To: Chris Faylor's message of Wed, 8 Mar 2000 21:10:13 -0500
Message-ID: <s1sput129bb.fsf@jaist.ac.jp>
Lines: 24
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.3/Emacs 19.34

>>> On Wed, 8 Mar 2000 21:10:13 -0500
>>> Chris Faylor <cgf AT cygnus DOT com> said:

> Have all of the toolchain directory issues been worked out?

I understand all executable binaries should be stored in
`usr/bin' according to the discussion about the directory
structure.

`cygwin' package has been repackaged according to the
discussion.  But other packages (except for the packages having
no need to be repackaged, such as `gcc', `gdb', and `binutils')
are leaved alone.

DJ, can you repackage these packages ?

I want to check these packages will be released at the
forthcoming net release with their complete set of files.
At present, diff.tar.gz doesn't contain cmp.exe, and gzip.tar.gz
doesn't contain gunzip.exe as far as I noticed.
____
  | AIST      Kazuhiro Fujieda <fujieda AT jaist DOT ac DOT jp>
  | HOKURIKU  School of Information Science
o_/ 1990      Japan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology