Message-Id: <200003012306.SAA12852@delorie.com>
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>, <http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
From: "Parker, Ron" <rdparker AT butlermfg DOT org>
To: cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Subject: RE: FS layout issues for v1.1 (eg., /bin and /usr/bin)
Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2000 15:28:07 -0600 
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0)
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="windows-1252"

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Glenn Spell [mailto:glenn AT gs DOT fay DOT nc DOT us]

<snip>

> Seems to me that the bootstrapping and build process could remain
> the same except for one final step of moving or copying a few agreed
> upon executables from /usr/bin to /bin. I'm thinking that if we copy
> instead of move then then the mount/symlinks issues will be simpler.

<snip>

With the usual caveat of complicating updating to new versions of these
files. (Not saying one is worse than the other, merely a trade off.)