Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com From: Chris Faylor Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2000 17:51:13 -0500 To: cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Subject: Re: Installation Routine Message-ID: <20000225175113.B318@cygnus.com> Reply-To: cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com References: <20000225083945 DOT 22749 DOT qmail AT hotmail DOT com> <38B64FB1 DOT CD9B12D3 AT vinschen DOT de> <20000225053004 DOT A11333 AT shell4 DOT ba DOT best DOT com> <20000225111653 DOT D31323 AT cygnus DOT com> <20000225174004 DOT A1151 AT shell4 DOT ba DOT best DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.1.4i In-Reply-To: <20000225174004.A1151@shell4.ba.best.com>; from glenn@gs.fay.nc.us on Fri, Feb 25, 2000 at 05:40:04PM -0500 On Fri, Feb 25, 2000 at 05:40:04PM -0500, Glenn Spell wrote: >I don't know if the bzip2 files to which Ron's question refers >would be served from only Sourceware or not. But back in August >I did send Jason the following patch for the Sourceware Apache >configuration. This patch will alleviate the bz2 download problem. (I >also sent him some suggestions for solving similiar problems with >MHonArc.) I believe that, at the time, he was to busy to pursue >this. I don't know if any changes have been made since to the >Sourceware configuration. I just now looked for some bz2 files on >Sourceware being served by http but did not find any. Jason's last day at Red Hat was last Wednesday, so if he hasn't incorporated these patches (and I don't remember hearing that he had) they're not in. Would you mind sending email to "kingdon AT redhat DOT com" instead? He's the new webmaster, apparently (things are kind of in flux). >So... personally, I see no problem with Ron using bzip2. I >suspect that these files will be served via ftp anyway so Apache >configuration would not even enter into the equation. I have no problems with bzip2 either but I haven't seen DJ weigh in on this one. He had some opinions about this, IIRC. cgf