Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2000 05:30:04 -0500 From: Glenn Spell To: cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Subject: Re: Installation Routine Message-ID: <20000225053004.A11333@shell4.ba.best.com> Reply-To: cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com References: <20000225083945 DOT 22749 DOT qmail AT hotmail DOT com> <38B64FB1 DOT CD9B12D3 AT vinschen DOT de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i In-Reply-To: <38B64FB1.CD9B12D3@vinschen.de>; from "Corinna Vinschen" on Fri, Feb 25, 2000 at 10:47AM Organization: the aerie On 25 Feb 2000 around 10:47AM (+0100) Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > Is there any chance of using bzip2 in place of gzip? > > I wouldn't do that. As it is mentioned often in the cygwin base > mailing list, Netscape Navigator is able to mess up bzip2ed files > when downloading. Yes, but Navigator is just as able to mess up gzipped files served via http if the webserver is not configured properly for the file extension. > I fear the mail traffic followup... If packages will be distributed via http and the servers use the current Apache default configuration then that's a valid concern. -glenn -- ________________________________________ _ _____ ) )_ _ (__\____o /_/_ | ) Glenn Spell ) >-----._/_/__]> )________________________________________) `0 |