Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2000 20:41:41 -0500 From: Glenn Spell To: cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Subject: Re: next net release preview Message-ID: <20000223204140.A11405@shell4.ba.best.com> Reply-To: cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com References: <200002232151 DOT QAA14479 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <20000223191420 DOT A20059 AT shell4 DOT ba DOT best DOT com> <200002240035 DOT TAA11422 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <20000223200843 DOT A643 AT shell4 DOT ba DOT best DOT com> <200002240110 DOT UAA11995 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i In-Reply-To: <200002240110.UAA11995@envy.delorie.com>; from "DJ Delorie" on Wed, Feb 23, 2000 at 08:10PM Organization: the aerie On 23 Feb 2000 around 8:10PM (-0500) DJ Delorie wrote: > I do, however, expect that people working on a port discuss what > they're doing on the developers list and manage to give everyone > a warm and fuzzy feeling that the resulting port will be OK, > including doing at least some testing, maybe a few pre-releases, > that kind of stuff. That makes sense, except... I've had the impression for some time as a result of something I read (don't remember the particulars) that the developers list was only for discussing cygwin core issues and the discussion of porting issues was off topic for the developers list. Perhaps we'll need a "ports" list. -glenn -- ________________________________________ _ _____ ) )_ _ (__\____o /_/_ | ) Glenn Spell ) >-----._/_/__]> )________________________________________) `0 |